Schoenfeld
(PS) Gianelli v. Schoenfeld
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHEILA GIANELLI, No. 2:21–cv–0477–JAM–KJN PS Plaintiff, ORDER & FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
v. (ECF No. 17) RONALD STEVEN SCHOENFELD, et al., 15 Defendants.
17 Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to remand this case to state court. (ECF No. 17.) All four of the active defendants in this case filed a joint opposition, to which plaintiff replied. (ECF Nos. 23, 26.) The court took the motion under submission pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (ECF No. 25.) For the following reasons, the undersigned recommends denying the motion to remand. 23 1 Because plaintiff is representing herself, this action is referred to the undersigned for all pretrial proceedings, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, and Local Rule 302(c)(21).
26 2 The court accepts plaintiff’s reply brief although it was filed six days late, on May 19, 2021. See Local Rule 230(d) (reply due 7 days preceding hearing date, making the deadline May 13, 27 …