Ramos

(PC) Harper v. Ramos

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 25, 20211:17-cv-00606California8,828 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARCY AARON HARPER, 1:17-cv-00606-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANTS

v. DR. HTAY AND DR. RAMOS’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE

DR. RAMOS, et al., GRANTED (ECF No. 39.) Defendants.

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS I. BACKGROUND Darcy Aaron Harper (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds against defendants Dr. Htay, Dr. Ramos, and Dr. Varanasi for providing inadequate medical care in violation of the Eighth Amendment.1 On February 10, 2021, defendants Dr. Htay and Dr. Ramos (“Defendants”) filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 39.) On May 12, 2021, Plaintiff filed an opposition to the motion. (ECF No. 45.) On May 19, 2021, Defendants filed a reply to the opposition. (ECF No. 46.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.