Ramos
(PC) Harper v. Ramos
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DARCY AARON HARPER, 1:17-cv-00606-DAD-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANTS
v. DR. HTAY AND DR. RAMOS’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE
DR. RAMOS, et al., GRANTED (ECF No. 39.) Defendants.
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
FOURTEEN DAYS I. BACKGROUND Darcy Aaron Harper (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds against defendants Dr. Htay, Dr. Ramos, and Dr. Varanasi for providing inadequate medical care in violation of the Eighth Amendment.1 On February 10, 2021, defendants Dr. Htay and Dr. Ramos (“Defendants”) filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 39.) On May 12, 2021, Plaintiff filed an opposition to the motion. (ECF No. 45.) On May 19, 2021, Defendants filed a reply to the opposition. (ECF No. 46.) …