Sherman
(HC) Wilson v. Sherman
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEROME WILSON, Case No. 1:19-cv-01602-HBK Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
DISMISS PETITION AS UNTIMELY AND
v. FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM1 STU SHERMAN, OBJECTIONS DUE IN TWENTY-ONE
DAYS
Respondent. (Doc. No. 1) 16 Petitioner Jerome Wilson (“petitioner” or “Wilson”), a state prisoner, initiated this action by filing a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on November 4, 2012. (Doc. No. 1). On March 20, 2020, the court ordered petitioner to show cause why his petition should not be dismissed as untimely. (Doc. No. 5). After being granted three extensions of time, petitioner filed a response to the show cause order on September 11, 2020. (Doc. No. 12). For the reasons set forth below, the court recommends that the petition be dismissed with prejudice as time barred.
1 This matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)…