(HC) Reginald Tanubagijo v. Daniel Paramo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 REGINALD TANUBAGIJO, No. 2:18-CV-02290-MCE-CKD Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DANIEL PARAMO, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this habeas corpus action filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Currently pending before the court is petitioner’s motion to submit new claims which the court liberally construes as a motion to file a second amended § 2254 petition. See ECF No. 49. On April 8, 2021, the court set a briefing schedule on the motion to amend. ECF No. 49. Respondent filed an opposition and the time for petitioner to reply has expired. Thus, the mater is deemed submitted. For the reasons explained below, the undersigned recommends denying the motion to amend with prejudice. I. Procedural History On July 26, 2019, the district court judge adopted the Findings and Recommendations issued on March 13, 2019 and granted petitioner a stay and…