(HC) Godfrey v. Warden PBSP

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20211:19-cv-01197California617 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSHUA MICHAEL GODFREY, Case No. 1:19-cv-01197-NONE-HBK (HC) Petitioner, ORDER DIRECTING SUPPLEMENTAL

BRIEFING

v. WARDEN PBSP, Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner Joshua Michael Godfrey (“petitioner” or “Godfrey”), a state prisoner, initiated this action by filing a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on August 1, 2019. (Doc. No. 1). In response, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss. (Doc. No. 19). Petitioner filed an opposition (Doc. No. 22) and Respondent file a reply (Doc. No. 23). Godfrey is serving a determinate state prison sentence of 31 years and four months. (Doc. No. 23-1); People v. Godfrey, No. A157029, 2019 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 5043 (July 30, 2019). The petition challenges, on due process grounds, Godfrey’s 2016 disciplinary finding for distribution of controlled substances which resulted, inter alia, in Godfrey’s loss of 180 days of good-time credit. (See generally Doc. No. 1; Doc. No. 23-1 at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.