Sullivan

(PC) Ray v. Sullivan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20211:20-cv-01699California2,588 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD VINCENT RAY, JR., No. 1:20-cv-01699-NONE-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED

v. IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND THE CASE BE

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE1

WILLIAM JOE SULLIVAN, et al.,

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

Defendants. DAYS

(Doc. No. 2)

17 Plaintiff Edward Vincent Ray, Jr., a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se on his civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on December 3, 2020. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff accompanied the filing of his complaint with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Doc. No. 2). For the reasons set forth herein, the court recommends Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) be denied because Plaintiff has had at least three dismissals that constitute strikes and he has not established he meets the imminent danger exception. The court further recommends the case be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.