Borum

(PC) Shepard v. Borum

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20211:18-cv-00277California1,260 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAMONT SHEPARD, Case No. 1:18-cv-00277-DAD-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF’S

v. SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

M. BORUM, J. ACEBEDO, (Doc. No. 69) Defendants.

16 Pending review before the Court is Defendants’ motion to strike, or in the alternative, opposition to Plaintiff’s untimely second motion for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 69). I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Lamont Shepard, a state prisoner, initiated this action on February 21, 20181 by filing a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants M. Borum and J. Acebedo. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff is proceeding on his first amended complaint. (Doc. No. 13). On March 6, 2019, the Court issued a discovery and scheduling order (Doc. No. 20), which was thrice modified. (Doc. Nos. 26, 51, 63). The final order modifying the scheduling order set the

1 The Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.