Graham
Graham v. The Hertz Corporation
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK GRAHAM, individually and on Case No. 1:20-cv-00339-DAD-SKO behalf of all others similarly situated, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF Plaintiff, COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE 13 v. (Doc. 20) 14
THE HERTZ CORPORATION,
15 Defendant. 17
18 On June 1, 2021, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the entire action with prejudice. (Doc. 20.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
Sheila K. Oberto Dated: June 2, 2021 /s/ .
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28