Creamer

Creamer v. Sherer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 1, 20211:20-cv-00293California1,399 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 BRUCE WARREN CREAMER, Case No. 1:20-cv-00293-NONE-BAM 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE v. (Doc. No. 9) SUSIE SHERER, at al, 14 Defendants. FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE 15 Plaintiff Bruce Warren Creamer, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed the instant action on February 26, 2020. (Doc. No. 1.) On June 8, 2020, the Court screened Plaintiff’s original complaint and granted him leave to amend his complaint. (Doc. No. 6.) On July 7, 2020, Plaintiff filed his first amended complaint. (Doc. No. 7.) On February 10, 2021, the Court issued a second screening order and granted a final opportunity to amend the complaint. (Doc. No. 8.) Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, filed on February 22, 2021, is currently before the Court for screening. (Doc. No. 9.) I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court screens complaints brought by persons proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.