Purnell
Purnell v. Hunt
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 GEORGETTE G. PURNELL, Case No. 1:20-cv-01759-NONE-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE
ACTION SHOULD NOT BE
v. DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO SERVE,
FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH
N.HUNT, et al., THE COURT’S ORDER TO SUBMIT
DOCUMENTS FOR SERVICE, AND
Defendants. FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE (ECF NO. 9) TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE 17 18 Plaintiff Georgette G. Purnell is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed a complaint on December 11, 2020. (ECF No. 1). The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint on January 12, 2021, and found cognizable claims against Defendants N. Hunt, Luper, Garcia-Peralta and Carter for excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment. (ECF No. 5). The screening order instructed Plaintiff to, within 30 days, file a first amended complaint, notify the Court…