Purnell

Purnell v. Hunt

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20211:20-cv-01759California1,269 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 GEORGETTE G. PURNELL, Case No. 1:20-cv-01759-NONE-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

v. DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO SERVE,

FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH

N.HUNT, et al., THE COURT’S ORDER TO SUBMIT

DOCUMENTS FOR SERVICE, AND

Defendants. FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE (ECF NO. 9) TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE 17 18 Plaintiff Georgette G. Purnell is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed a complaint on December 11, 2020. (ECF No. 1). The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint on January 12, 2021, and found cognizable claims against Defendants N. Hunt, Luper, Garcia-Peralta and Carter for excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment. (ECF No. 5). The screening order instructed Plaintiff to, within 30 days, file a first amended complaint, notify the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.