(PC) Ramirez v. Director of CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20212:18-cv-02579California2,207 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALFONSO BOBBY CANTU RAMIREZ, No. 2:18-cv-2579 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

DIRECTOR OF CDCR, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. His Third Amended Complaint, ECF No. 34, is before the court for screening. I. Procedural History Plaintiff filed his original complaint in the Northern District of California. ECF No. 1. He was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis; the complaint was dismissed without prejudice on screening and judgment was entered. ECF No. 13, 14. After plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint, ECF No. 18, the judgment was vacated and the case was reopened and transferred to this court. ECF No. 19. On screening, the undersigned found that the First Amended Complaint did not state any viable claim for relief; plaintiff was granted leave to amend. ECF No. 26. Following…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.