White
(HC) Rockett v. White
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES ROCKETT, Case No. 1:21-cv-00766-HBK Petitioner, ORDER STAYING ORDER DIRECTING
RESPONDENT TO RESPOND TO PETITION
v. (Doc. No. 4) WARDEN WHITE,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PETITION
Respondent. SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED (Doc. No. 1) 17 18 Petitioner James Rockett, a federal prisoner, initiated this action by filing a pro se petition 19 for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on May 10, 2021. (Doc. No. 1, “Petition”). 20 Petitioner challenges the loss of his good time credits stemming from a November 2020 21 disciplinary action (1074087-R1). (Id. at 2). On May 19, 2021, the Court ordered Respondent to 22 respond to the Petition. (Doc. No. 4). 23 Upon further review of the Petition, the Court will order Petitioner to show cause why the 24 Petition should not be dismissed for his failure to exhaust his claims and/or as moot. The Court
1 The Court applies the “prison mailbox rule” to pro se prisoner petitions,…