Puila

(PS) Mincey v. Puila

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20212:20-cv-00571California3,285 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIE JAMES MINCEY, JR., LINDA No. 2:20-cv-0571 JAM DB PS

A. MASON-MINCEY,

12 Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. BETTY M. PUIIA, BETTY M. COMEAU, BETTY M. COMEAU, Trustee of the Betty M. Comeau Trust Dated May 7, 2019, UNITED STATES, et al., 17 Defendants. 19 Plaintiffs Willie James Mincey, Jr., and Linda A. Mason-Mincey, are proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the undersigned is defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 19.) For the reasons stated below, the undersigned recommends that defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted and plaintiffs’ complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on March 16, 2020, by filing a complaint and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.