(PS) Gigena v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 21, 20212:21-cv-00082California353 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GABRIEL GIGENA, No. 2:21-cv-00082-TLN-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Gabriel Gigena (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se in the instant action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On April 8, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the Plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff filed objections on April 13, 2021, and they were considered by the undersigned. (ECF No. 6.) This Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). As to any portion of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.