Hicks

(PC) Washington v. Hicks

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 24, 20211:19-cv-00156California756 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TRACYE BENARD WASHINGTON, 1:19-cv-00156-NONE-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION

vs. (ECF Nos. 48, 49.)

HICKS, et al., Defendants. 16 17 I. BACKGROUND Tracye Benard Washington (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Complaint filed on February 5, 2019, against defendants Sergeant David Hicks and Correctional Officer Hipolito Rocha (“Defendants”) for use of excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 1.)1 On May 13, 2021, the court issued an order granting Defendants’ motion to modify the scheduling order extending the deadlines for discovery and the filing of dispositive motions for all parties. (ECF No. 46.) On May 17, 2021, and May 19, 2021, Plaintiff filed oppositions to 27 1 On June 22, 2020, the court issued an order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.