Ramos
(PC) Harper v. Ramos
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DARCY AARON HARPER, 1:17-cv-00606-DAD-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANT
v. VARANASI’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT BE GRANTED
DR. RAMOS, et al., (ECF No. 34.)
Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
FOURTEEN DAYS
12 I. BACKGROUND Darcy Aaron Harper (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds against defendants Dr. Htay, Dr. Ramos, and Dr. Varanasi for providing inadequate medical care in violation of the Eighth Amendment.1 On January 8, 2021, defendant Dr. Varanasi (“Defendant”) filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 34.) On February 2, 2021, Plaintiff filed an opposition to the motion.2 (ECF No. 37.) On February 9, 2021, Defendant filed a reply to the opposition. (ECF No. 38.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), this motion is now before the court. 22…