Ostrander

(PC) Cruz v. Ostrander

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 4, 20211:19-cv-00994California783 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 GUILLERMO TRUJILLO CRUZ, Case No. 1:19-cv-0994-AWI-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING IN PART AND

REJECTING IN PART FINDINGS AND

v.

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY

LT. J. OSTRANDER, S. SAVOIE, PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Defendants. (Doc. 32)

TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 3, 2021, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations determining that Plaintiff had “three strikes,” prior cases or appeals dismissed because they were frivolous, malicious, or failed to state a claim, and that Plaintiff did not meet the “imminent danger” exception. (Doc. 34.) The magistrate judge recommended the denial of Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.