Rodriguez

(PC) Singanonh v. Rodriguez

Caution
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20211:18-cv-00590California8,047 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

17 Tiengkham Singanonh (“Plaintiff”) is a former prisoner1 proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 This case proceeds “on Plaintiff’s original complaint (ECF No. 1), on Plaintiff’s claims 20 against Defendants Corporal Rodriguez, Corporal Pre[e2], Correctional Officer Sanchez, and 21 Correctional Officer Esquivel for excessive force and failure to provide medical care.” (ECF 22 No. 19, p. 3) (footnote omitted).3 23 On January 20, 2021, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on all claims, 24 which includes a request for judicial notice. (ECF No. 59). On April 5, 2021, Plaintiff filed his

26 1 Plaintiff has alleged that he was a pretrial detainee at the time of the underlying incident. (ECF No. 14, p. 7). 2 Based on representations made by Defendants, the spelling of this defendant’s last name is “Pree.” (See, e.g., ECF No. 32, p. 1) opposition. (ECF No. 66). On April 8, 2021, Defendants filed their reply. (ECF No. 68).4 For the reasons that follow, the Court will recommend that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment be granted and that their request…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.