Arce

(PC) Hendrix v. Arce

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 4, 20211:20-cv-01307California2,485 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BENJAMIN HENDRIX, Case No. 1:20-cv-01307-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

FILE A THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

v. OR NOTIFY THE COURT OF HIS

DESIRE TO PROCEED ONLY ON

FOULK, et al., CLAIM FOUND COGNIZABLE

Defendants. (Doc. 17)

21-DAY DEADLINE

17 Benjamin Hendrix alleges the defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. (Doc. 17.) The Court finds that Plaintiff’s second amended complaint states a cognizable claim against Defendant Arce but not Defendant Santoro. Accordingly, the Court directs Plaintiff to file a third amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified in this order or a notice that he wishes to proceed only on the claim found cognizable. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or an officer or employee of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.