Kernan

(PC) Thornberry v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 21, 20212:17-cv-00953California554 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL LEE THORNBERRY, No. 2:17-cv-00953-TLN-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER J. BAL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Daniel Lee Thornberry (“Plaintiff”), a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302(c)(21). On March 16, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified. (ECF No. 119.) The magistrate judge recommended granting Defendants J. Bal (“Bal”), Michael Felder, M. Bobbala, C. Smith, and James Chau’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 111) and denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 104) as moot. (Id. at 40.) On April 6, 2021, Plaintiff filed objections after the specified…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.