(PS) Davidzon v. SF Markets, LLC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VLADISLAV DAVIDZON., No. 2:20-CV-2221-JAM-DMC Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SF MARKETS, LLC, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. On March 22, 2021, the Court directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 30 days. Pursuant to this Court’s local rules, the failure to comply with a court order may result in dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. To date, plaintiff has not complied with the Court’s March 22, 2021, order. The Court must weigh five factors before imposing the harsh sanction of dismissal. See Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000); Malone v. U.S. Postal Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th Cir. 1987). Those factors are: (1) the public's interest in expeditious resolution of litigation; (2) the court's need to…