Rudas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MONRELL D. MURPHY, No. 2:20-cv-0073 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER RUDAS, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendant failed to provide adequate medical treatment in violation of his Eighth Amendment rights. Presently before the court is defendant’s fully briefed motion to compel. (ECF No. 35.) For the reasons set forth below, the court will grant the motion and direct plaintiff to supplement his responses. I. Defendant’s Motion Defendant argues plaintiff’s responses to several interrogatories and requests for production are incomplete. Defendant seeks to compel plaintiff to supplement his responses to the identified requests. Plaintiff has filed a one-page opposition to defendant’s motion. (ECF No. 36.) Therein, plaintiff argues the motion should be denied because defendant failed to meet…