Moore

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDRE L. REVIS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00034-DAD-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS DEFENDANT AND CLAIMS

v. (Doc. 27) S. SHERMAN, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Andre L. Revis alleges the defendants have denied him a kosher diet in violation of the First Amendment and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. (Doc. 27.) The Court finds that Plaintiff’s third amended complaint states cognizable claims against Defendants Moore, Alvarez, Guembe, and Shieffer, but not against Defendant Corral. Given that Plaintiff has received three opportunities to amend, the Court finds that further amendment would be futile. See Akhtar v. Mesa, 698 F.3d 1202, 1212-13 (9th Cir. 2012). Therefore, the Court recommends that Defendant Corral be dismissed. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or an officer…