Larosa

(PC) Lovest v. Larosa

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 7, 20212:19-cv-01060California1,906 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 ANTWONE M. LOVEST, Jr., Case No. 2:19-cv-01060-TLN-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT BE GRANTED AND ALL

OTHER OUTSTANDING MOTIONS BE

S. LAROSA, DENIED AS MOOT DEFENDANT. OBJECTIONS DUE IN 14 DAYS ECF Nos. 32, 33, 34, 36 14 Antwone M. Lovest, Jr. alleges that defendant LaRosa used racially derogatory language toward him on February 5, 2019. Defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment that argues that plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before filing this action. ECF No. 32. Plaintiff filed a single prison grievance related to the claims in this case, but did not pursue it through the third and final level of administrative review. Accordingly, he did not comply with the requirements of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Defendant’s motion should be granted, the case dismissed, and all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.