O'Campo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVE CRUMP, No. 2:20-cv-2343 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER A. O’CAMPO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis with an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Both parties filed motions. As set forth below, plaintiff’s renewed motion is denied without prejudice, and defendant O’Campo is granted an extension of time to file a responsive pleading. Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion for Injunctive Relief On May 27, 2021, plaintiff again renewed his motion for preliminary injunction.1 However, on March 15, 2021, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations addressing plaintiff’s first motion for preliminary injunction, which was adopted by the district court on May 3, 2021, over plaintiff’s objections. Plaintiff’s recently renewed motion includes no new factual 26 On May 24, 2021, plaintiff previously renewed his motion, which was denied without prejudice 27 …