(PS) Bell v. Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20212:20-cv-02539California411 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DELTHENIA BELL, et al., Case No. 2:20-cv-02539-TLN-JDP (PS) Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION
TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
v. TO FILE REDACTED DOCUMENTS HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY ECF Nos. 15, 17 OF SACRAMENTO, et al., ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANTS’ Defendants. MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE ECF No. 9 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION
TO RESET INITIAL SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE ECF No. 21 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION
REQUEST
22 ECF No. 22 23 Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 9. Defendants argue that plaintiffs’ complaint does not plead sufficiently detailed or specific factual allegations and is, therefore, defective for failing to articulate a plausible claim.…