(PS) Bell v. Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20212:20-cv-02539California411 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DELTHENIA BELL, et al., Case No. 2:20-cv-02539-TLN-JDP (PS) Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT AND

v. TO FILE REDACTED DOCUMENTS HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY ECF Nos. 15, 17 OF SACRAMENTO, et al., ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANTS’ Defendants. MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE ECF No. 9 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

TO RESET INITIAL SCHEDULING

CONFERENCE ECF No. 21 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

REQUEST

22 ECF No. 22 23 Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 9. Defendants argue that plaintiffs’ complaint does not plead sufficiently detailed or specific factual allegations and is, therefore, defective for failing to articulate a plausible claim.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.