Huynh
Huynh v. Sutter Health
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ANH BAO VY HUYNH, No. 2:20–cv–1757–MCE–CKD Plaintiff, ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY v. (ECF No. 27) SUTTER HEALTH, et al., Defendants. 16 Presently before the court is the United States government’s motion for a protective order temporarily staying discovery in this litigation. (ECF No. 27.) The parties filed a joint statement regarding the discovery disagreement, along with a supporting declaration and exhibit. (ECF Nos. 28-28.2.) The court heard remote arguments on the motion on June 2, 2021. (ECF No. 29.) AUSA Joseph Frueh appeared for the government, and attorney Sean Musgrove appeared for the plaintiff. There were no appearances for defendant Dr. Nathan Hale Allen or for Sutter Medical Center2 and Sutter Valley Roseville Medical Center Foundation (“the Sutter 24 1 The matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local 25 Rule 302(c)(1) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
26 2 The caption of the…