Huddleston

(UD)(PS) Mashhadialireza v. Huddleston

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20212:21-cv-00914California1,160 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MAJID MASHHADIALIREZA, No. 2:21-cv-00914-TLN-DB Plaintiff, v. SUA SPONTE REMAND ORDER ANDRE MICHAEL HUDDLESTON, SR., and VONETTA VONETTE HUDDLESTON, Defendants. 17 This matter is before the Court on Defendants Andre Huddleston, Sr., and Vonetta Huddleston’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Notice of Removal and Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1–2.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby REMANDS the action to the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento, due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Defendants’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is DENIED as moot. /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On or about January 4, 2021, Plaintiff Majid Mashhadialireza (“Plaintiff”) brought an action for unlawful detainer against Defendants for possession of certain real property located in Rancho Cordova, California. (ECF No. 1 at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.