Martin

(PC) Evans v. Martin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20211:21-cv-00093California9,006 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID EVANS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00093-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

v. ACTION MARTIN, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN

Defendants. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS (ECF Nos. 1, 11, 12)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

17 I. Background Plaintiff David Evans (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 13, 2021, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that Plaintiff stated a cognizable claim against Defendants Guerra, Jolly, and Lopez for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment for the incident on January 19, 2019 and against Defendant Guerra for sexual assault in violation of the Eighth Amendment for the incident on January 19, 2019, but failed to state any other cognizable claims or properly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.