(PC) Eastman v. Tuolumne County Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20211:20-cv-01303California766 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH CLARENCE EASTMAN, No. 1:20-cv-01303-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST

FOR RECONSIDERATION AND FOR

TUOLUMNE COUNTY JAIL, et al., COPIES OF COMPLAINTS HE HAS FILED Defendants. (Doc. No. 28) 16 Plaintiff Joseph Clarence Eastman is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 12, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s second amended complaint and issued findings and recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed due to plaintiff’s failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 and failure to state a cognizable claim upon which relief may be granted. (Doc. No. 22.) Plaintiff filed untimely objections on March 18, 2021, requesting that he be allowed to proceed on his first amended complaint that was not screened, rather than the second amended complaint that was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.