(PS) Murphy v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHANNON O. MURPHY, SR., d/b/a No. 2:21–cv–0398–JAM–CKD PS

SHEETMETAL & ASSOCIATES,

ORDER Plaintiff, (ECF Nos. 1, 3) v.

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND

HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. 17 On April 5, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 3), which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, 26 …