(SS) Packard v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20211:20-cv-00463California9,452 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

INTRODUCTION

18 Kimberly Denise Packard (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the 19 Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying her application for 20 disability benefits pursuant to the Social Security Act. The matter is currently before the Court 21 on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted, without oral argument, to Magistrate Judge Stanley 22 A. Boone.1

II.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

25 Plaintiff filed an application for supplemental security income on December 10, 2003 and 26 was found to be not disabled in decision issued on March 21, 2006. (AR 17, 76-84.) 27 1 The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge and the matter has been Plaintiff protectively filed an application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits and a Title XVI application for supplemental security income on May 26, 2016. (AR 118.) Plaintiff’s applications were initially denied on October 6, 2016, and denied upon reconsideration on March 10, 2017. (AR 148-152, 156-160.) Plaintiff requested and received a hearing before Administrative Law…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.