(PC) Kyle v. California Victim Compensation Board

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 7, 20212:21-cv-00479California368 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Donta Ladeal Kyle, No. 2:21-cv-00479-KJM-KJIN Plaintiffs, ORDER v. California Victim Compensation Board, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 Donta Ladeal a Kyle, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 18 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 9, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. F&Rs, ECF No. 5. The magistrate 23 judge recommends dismissing the complaint without leave to amend because the defendant, the 24 California Victim Compensation Board, is not a “person” under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See generally 25 id. Kyle objects to the findings…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.