Coleman

Coleman v. Shasta County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 21, 20212:17-cv-00655California989 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES COLEMAN, IV and MC No. 2:17-cv-00655-TLN-DMC

HEALTH & WELLNESS CENTER, INC.,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v.

COUNTY OF SHASTA; SHASTA

COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; DEPUTY

TIM ESTES; DEPUTY GARY

NUNNELY; and DOES 1–10, Defendants. 18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs James Coleman, IV and MC Health & Wellness Center, Inc.’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order. (ECF No. 28.) Defendants County of Shasta, Shasta County Sheriff’s Office, Deputy Tim Estes, and Deputy Gary Nunnely (collectively, “Defendants”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 29.) Plaintiffs did not file a reply. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion. Plaintiffs request a three-month extension to the discovery deadline. (ECF No. 28-1 at 7.) The Scheduling Order in this case provides that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 More specifically, Plaintiffs seek to extend the discovery deadline…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.