Fox
(PC) Reed v. Fox
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN REED, No. 2:19-cv-00275 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ROBERT W. FOX, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The First Amended Complaint, ECF No. 14, is before the court for screening. I. Background Plaintiff’s original complaint, ECF No. 1, set forth twenty-one claims against twenty-one defendants. The undersigned screened the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) and found that it did not state a cognizable claim for relief against any defendant. ECF No. 9. Plaintiff was granted leave to amend, and was provided information regarding pleading standards and the elements of his various attempted claims for relief. Id. The First Amended Complaint, ECF No. 14, helpfully refines the issues and presents three claims against three defendants. II. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints The…