(SS) Ryan v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 4, 20211:19-cv-00973California356 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

REBECCA LOU RYAN, Case No. 1:19-cv-00973-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING SHELLIE LOTT TO

SHOW CAUSE WHY MONETARY

v. SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED

FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, COURT ORDER

Defendant. RESPONSE DUE JUNE 9, 2021

16 On May 18, 2021, plaintiff’s counsel, Shellie Lott (“Petitioner”) filed a motion for attorney fees in this action. (ECF No. 24.) The motion did not inform plaintiff that she could object to the motion or provide a timeline to file an objection. Therefore, on May 24, 2021, an order issued providing plaintiff with such notice. (ECF No. 25.) The order required Petitioner to serve a copy upon plaintiff within five days and promptly file the proof of service. (Id.) Petitioner has not filed proof of service or otherwise responded to the May 24, 2021 order. Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.