(SS) Ryan v. Commissioner of Social Security
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 4, 20211:19-cv-00973California356 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
REBECCA LOU RYAN, Case No. 1:19-cv-00973-SAB
Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING SHELLIE LOTT TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY MONETARY
v. SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED
FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, COURT ORDER
Defendant. RESPONSE DUE JUNE 9, 2021
16 On May 18, 2021, plaintiff’s counsel, Shellie Lott (“Petitioner”) filed a motion for attorney fees in this action. (ECF No. 24.) The motion did not inform plaintiff that she could object to the motion or provide a timeline to file an objection. Therefore, on May 24, 2021, an order issued providing plaintiff with such notice. (ECF No. 25.) The order required Petitioner to serve a copy upon plaintiff within five days and promptly file the proof of service. (Id.) Petitioner has not filed proof of service or otherwise responded to the May 24, 2021 order. Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court…