CDCR
(PC) Steele v. CDCR
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUSTIN STEELE, Case No. 1:19-cv-00471-AWI-JLT (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
v. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE
COURT’S ORDER
CDCR, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE Defendants.
16 On April 27, 2021, the Court issued a screening order finding that Plaintiff’s first amended complaint states cognizable claims against Defendants in their individual capacities, but not in their official capacities. The Court therefore directed Plaintiff, within 21 days, to file a second amended complaint curing the deficiencies in his pleading or a notice that he wishes to proceed only on the claims found cognizable. (Doc. 23.) Although more than the allowed time has passed, Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint or a notice to proceed. The Local Rules, corresponding with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, provide, “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with . . . any order of the…