Sanchez

Sanchez v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 4, 20212:19-cv-01545California3,354 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CRYSTAL R. SANCHEZ, No. 2:19-cv-01545 MCE AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion to compel responses to her Requests for Production 48 and 50-60 (ECF 56, 58)1 from defendant the County of Sacramento. The motion is referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(1) and it was heard on the papers following the parties’ submission of a joint statement regarding the discovery dispute. ECF No. 58. For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part, and no fees are awarded. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND Plaintiff alleges that on May 17, 2019, she was unlawfully detained, and her vehicle was unlawfully seized and searched by defendant Officer Allbee, a law enforcement officer employed 27 The initial motion seeks to compel responses to RFPs 48-60, but RFP 49 was apparently 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.