Pfeiffer
(PC) Edward Thomas v. Pfeiffer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD N. THOMAS, No. 1:20-cv-01131-NONE-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS IN PART
v., (Doc. No. 6) 14 CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Edward N. Thomas is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff filed an application on August 31, 2020 to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. No. 4). On September 1, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations finding that plaintiff had “three or more actions dismissed as frivolous, as malicious, or for failing to state a claim upon which relief maybe granted” and had not alleged imminent danger, and thus recommending plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. (Doc. No. 6 at 1- 2). The assigned…