Leatherman

(PC) Reed v. Leatherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 28, 20212:18-cv-00038California1,259 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 12 PETER J. REED, 2:18-cv-00038-KJM-CKD P 13 Plaintiff, PROTECTIVE ORDER 14 v. Judge: Honorable Carolyn K. Delaney Trial Date: TBA Action Filed: January 8, 2018 D. LEATHERMAN, et al., Defendants. 18 In compliance with the Court’s Order (ECF No. 47), Defendants submit the following protective order under Rule 26 to protect the confidential documents identified in AGO 28 – AGO 45 as reviewed during the Court’s in-camera review. 1. In connection with discovery proceedings in this action, a Party who produces a document or documents to another Party may designate any document, or other information derived from them, as “CONFIDENTIAL” under the terms of this protective order. The documents identified as AGO 28 – AGO 45 and submitted to the Court for in-camera review, shall be identified as “CONFIDENTIAL” and all provisions of this protective order shall…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.