Sherman

(PC) Rayford v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 28, 20211:19-cv-00225California1,262 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EUGENE RAYFORD, 1:19-cv-00225-AWI-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER INFORMING PLAINTIFF THAT HE

MAY NOT ADD INFORMATION PIECEMEAL

vs. TO THE COMPLAINT

SHERMAN, et al., ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S

DECLARATION AS IMPROPERLY FILED

(ECF No. 38.) Defendants. ORDER FOR CLERK TO SEND COMPLAINT

FORM TO PLAINTIFF

17 I. BACKGROUND Eugene Rayford (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 7, 2019, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action in the Sacramento Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. (ECF No. 1.) On February 15, 2019, the case was transferred to this court. (ECF No. 6.) On February 28, 2019, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint as a matter of course. (ECF No. 12.) On April 29, 2020, the court screened the First Amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.