Burlingham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL CHRISTOPHER YOUNG, et al., No. 2:21–cv–537–TLN-KJN PS Plaintiffs, ORDER v. STEVEN RICHARD BURLINGHAM, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 In March 2021, plaintiffs, who are proceeding without counsel, filed claims against defendants, paid the filing fee, and executed service. On May 25, defendants Beyer, Brown, and Schreiber filed a motion to dismiss, noticing the motion for a July 2, 2021 hearing before the undersigned. (ECF No. 8.) Under the Court’s Local Rules, plaintiff was obligated to file and serve written opposition (or statement of non-opposition) to Beyer, Brown and Schreiber’s motion at least fourteen days prior to the hearing date: June 24, 2021. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(c) (“Opposition, if any, to the granting of the motion shall be in writing and shall be filed and served not less than fourteen (14) days preceding the [] hearing date.”). A review of the court’s docket reveals plaintiff failed to do either by the deadline. Defendant Pearl’s motion to dismiss…