(PC) Folsom v. County of Shasta
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LESTER STANLEY FOLSOM, No. 2:21-cv-0186 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &
RECOMMENDATIONS
COUNTY OF SHASTA, et al., Defendants.
17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. In an order filed March 17, 2021, this court found plaintiff failed to state any claims for relief cognizable under section 1983. This court gave plaintiff sixty days to file an amended complaint and recommended some claims be dismissed. (ECF No. 6.) The March 17 order and findings and recommendations was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by the postal service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More than sixty-three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and plaintiff has failed to notify the court…