Wallace

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL KAHAKU, No. 2:20-cv-1807 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND REVISED SCHEDULING

ORDER

K. WALLANCE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants seek a ninety-day extension of time to respond to plaintiff’s “voluminous” discovery requests which consist of at least 210 pages. (ECF No. 24 at 2.) Subsequently, plaintiff filed a motion to modify the discovery and scheduling order to allow him time to receive and review defendants’ discovery responses, and file a motion to compel further responses. As discussed below, the parties’ motions are granted. Plaintiff’s Complaint Plaintiff alleges that defendants K. Wallace, A. Bustamante, T. Freitas, J. Vina, E. Speer, J. Canela, N. Hang, and G. Ellis conspired to retaliate against plaintiff by conducting multiple retaliatory cell searches because plaintiff filed lawsuits in which…