Winkfield

(PC) Hawkins v. Winkfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 28, 20212:19-cv-01228California587 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFF HAWKINS, No. 2:19-cv-1228 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER M. WINKFIELD, et al., Defendants. 16 On May 17, 2021, defendants Decker, Pendleton, Whipple, and Winkfield1 filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiff did not oppose the motion.2 Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .” Id. On May 17, 2021, plaintiff was advised of the requirements 23 Defendant Troncoso is deceased. 24 On May 13, 2021, plaintiff filed a document styled, “Declaration in Opposition to Summary 25 Judgment Motion of Defendant,” in which he addresses the merits of his claims. (ECF No. 83.) However, plaintiff’s document, signed on May 7 and 8, 2021, cannot be construed as addressing 26 the pending motion for summary judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.