Garcia

Garcia v. City of Farmersville

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 29, 20211:21-cv-00482California645 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIA ELENA GARCIA, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00482-NONE-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING STIPULATED

PROTECTIVE ORDER WITHOUT PREJUDICE

v. (ECF No. 35) CITY OF FARMERSVILLE, et al.,

Defendants.

16 On June 28, 2021, the parties filed a Stipulated Protective Order. (ECF No. 35.) The Good Cause Statement section of the proposed protective order states:

This action is likely to involve confidential and private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. Such information may implicate the privacy interests of the parties and are properly protected through a Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) protective order. See Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehart, 467 U.S. 20, 35 n.21 (1984) (“Rule 26(c) includes among its express purposes the protection of a ‘party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression or undue burden or expense.’ Although the Rule…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.