Newsom
(PC) De La Cruz v. Newsom
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 11 JOSE MIGUEL DE LA CRUZ, Case No. 1:20-cv-00997-DAD-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF PRO BONO v. COUNSEL, WITHOUT PREJUDICE 14 OSCAR GALLOWAY, et al., (ECF No. 28)
Defendants.
17 Jose Miguel Da Le Cruz (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 28, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of pro bono counsel, along with a copy of his prisoner trust fund account statement. (ECF Nos. 28 & 29). Plaintiff asks for appointment of counsel because he is unable to afford counsel; because the issues involved in this case are complex; because, as a segregation inmate, Plaintiff has extremely limited access to the law library; because Plaintiff wrote letters to attorneys asking them to represent him, to no avail; and because plaintiff has limited knowledge of the law. Plaintiff does not have a constitutional…