Ramsey
(HC) Prince v. Ramsey
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID SWANK PRINCE, No. 2: 20-cv-1962 TLN KJN P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS MICHAEL RAMSEY, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is proceeding, without counsel, with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On May 27, 2021, the undersigned ordered petitioner to show cause, within twenty-one days, why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to prosecute. (ECF No. 22.) Twenty-one days passed and petitioner did not respond to the May 27, 2021 order. Accordingly, for the reasons stated herein, the undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed for petitioner’s failure to prosecute. At the outset, the undersigned observes that he has not yet ordered respondent to file a response to any claims raised by petitioner because the issue of what claims petitioner intends to raise has not been resolved, as discussed herein. The petition raises two claims: 1) ineffective…