Lozano

(PC) Chinsami v. Lozano

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 29, 20212:20-cv-01792California1,815 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHU CHINSAMI, No. 2:20-cv-1792 JAM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

JARED LOZANO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Before the court is plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) for screening. For the reasons set forth below, this court will dismiss the FAC with leave to amend and will recommend plaintiff’s claims based on allegations that a computer lens was implanted in his eye be dismissed with prejudice. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is incarcerated at the California Medical Facility (“CMF”). Plaintiff’s primary allegations appear to involve an eye implant and involuntary medication. On screening, this court found plaintiff failed to state any cognizable claims relief under § 1983. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff was given sixty days to file an amended complaint. On May 20, 2021, plaintiff filed his FAC. (ECF No. 15.) This…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.