Lozano
(PC) Chinsami v. Lozano
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHU CHINSAMI, No. 2:20-cv-1792 JAM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
JARED LOZANO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Before the court is plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) for screening. For the reasons set forth below, this court will dismiss the FAC with leave to amend and will recommend plaintiff’s claims based on allegations that a computer lens was implanted in his eye be dismissed with prejudice. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is incarcerated at the California Medical Facility (“CMF”). Plaintiff’s primary allegations appear to involve an eye implant and involuntary medication. On screening, this court found plaintiff failed to state any cognizable claims relief under § 1983. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff was given sixty days to file an amended complaint. On May 20, 2021, plaintiff filed his FAC. (ECF No. 15.) This…