Archer

Archer v. City of Taft, Ca. Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 30, 20211:12-cv-00261California2,989 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARRELL ARCHER and KEITHA No. 1:12-cv-00261-NONE-JLT

DARQUEA,

FURTHER ORDER RE: REQUEST FOR AN Plaintiffs ORDER OF FULL SATISFACTION 13 v. (Doc. No. 167) 14 J.E. BURKE CONSTRUCTION, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiffs Darrel Archer and Keitha Darquea, proceeding pro se, initiated this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on February 23, 2012. (Doc. No. 1.) Plaintiffs proceeded pro se until July 2, 2015, at which time the court allowed attorneys Timothy Kassouni and Angela Thompson to substitute in as counsel of record for plaintiffs. (Doc. Nos. 92–95.) A jury trial was held in the matter, beginning August 4, 2015. (Doc. Nos. 117–19.) The jury found in favor of plaintiffs on their claims that defendants Jill Gipson, J.E. Burke Construction, Inc., and Joseph Burke violated plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment rights by unlawfully seizing their personal property without a warrant and that defendants deprived plaintiffs of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.